calendar icon
SCHEDULE YOUR APPOINTMENT
Contact Us

U.S. Supreme Court rules Padilla Not Retroactive

U.S. Supreme Court rules Padilla Not Retroactive

Immigration Consequences of Criminal Convictions

In Atlanta, and across the country, representing clients in immigration removal proceedings with criminal convictions can be tricky. The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Chaidaz v. U.S., _____ U.S. _____ (2013), is bound to make things even trickier. Far too often, we come across the non-citizen client who has already accepted a plea in criminal court without receiving competent advice from his attorney regarding the devastating consequences of deportation.

In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized this deficiency in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. ____ (2010), when it ruled that 6th Amendment protections require criminal defense attorneys to inform non-citizen clients when there is a risk of deportation as a result of a guilty plea. After Padilla, non-citizens who were placed in removal proceedings for their criminal conviction were able to raise specific 6th Amendment challenges through petitions for habeas corpus and other similar post conviction mechanisms.

What happens if a person’s conviction occurred prior to the Padilla decision in 2010? The District Courts were left to determine the answer, and many reached different results using the “new rule” principles of Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). Essentially, if the Court announced a “new rule” in Padilla, the holding cannot apply to subsequent challenges with already-final convictions. However, if the decision was merely an application of the existing standards that govern ineffective assistance of counsel established by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), then the ruling could be applied retroactively to convictions entered prior to 2010.

In the recent Chaidez case, the Supreme Court said that the Padilla rule does not apply retroactively. Here’s how they got there. First, instead of simply assessing whether Padilla’s representation fell “below an objective standard of reasonableness,” which is the “regular” Strickland test, the Supreme Court for the first time said in Padilla that an attorney must affirmatively advise a client of the negative collateral consequences of a guilty plea. Next, the Court noted that the main question in Padilla was not whether counsel was ineffective by remaining silent on the issue, but rather “does the scope of the 6th Amendment extend to consequences outside of the criminal proceedings?” Because there was no prior precedent which dictated this answer, the Padilla decision “broke new ground.” Because it broke new ground, the rule is not applied retroactively to cases handled before the Padilla decision was announced.

Unfortunately for Ms. Chaidez and many others, when an immigration attorney completely fails to advise that an aggravated felony conviction triggers mandatory deportation, this failure by the lawyer cannot be challenged under Padilla if the plea was entered before 2010. However, all may not be lost because the Court hints at the remaining potential for challenges under the pre-existing Strickland test. It leaves open the possibility to challenge “material representations” where the client is affirmatively misled with the wrong advice regarding deportation or another collateral matter. Ultimately, the Court highlights that deportation “is a ‘particularly severe’ penalty,” and advice of a plea’s deportation risk should “not [be] exempt from Sixth Amendment scrutiny.”

Does this mean that non-citizens who pleaded guilty before March 31, 2010 should simply give up without attempting to challenge their lawyer’s ineffective assistance of counsel? Of course not. A person facing deportation from a country she considers home may feel it is worth every effort to fight removal, so long as it is understood that this recent decision limits the likelihood of success.

You deserve to be represented by the first 100% CrImmigration Law Firm in the country

As the first and only law firm that remains 100% committed to the defense of non-U.S. citizens through criminal and immigration law exclusively, we know you best. We know what success looks like for you… You will work with a team committed to the education of their community, their colleagues and themselves.

logo-icon
logo-icon
logo-icon
logo-icon
logo-icon
Take a stand for your future,RIGHT NOW.

If you’re ready to relentlessly FIGHT for your freedom, and WON’T take “no” for an answer, connect with STERN Law today!

Follow us on FB for Current Immigration Policy/Law Updates

Call Us

    We respect your privacy

    STERN Law STERN Law
    So far so good. Stern law has been very attentive to my immigration legal needs
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Staff were attentive to my needs and very organized in their strategy in regards to my case. Recomm...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Hello, in my experience in stern law it was very beautiful and exciting in the way that every day th...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Hi I just wanted to say that I truly appreciated all the work that SternLaw did for me. They made th...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Jessica Stern and her team are incredible! They made me feel safe and that I made the right choice w...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Excellent
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Jessica at Stern Law is a great attorney. She is very understanding and I am very grateful toward ...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Google
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Excellent Service!!!
    STERN Law STERN Law
    An attorney with a passion for helping. Her approach in unique, she’s by far a great person and extr...
    Google
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Great job by all involved in my case
    STERN Law STERN Law
    excelente servicio muy recomendable
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Ms . Stern and the complete team was super caring...I was so glad to find this Law firm as I was fac...
    Google
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Best Imigration Law team ever Very recommended 👌
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Good at the job, I would highly recommend for best results
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Great great service
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Wonderful service!
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Great ‘ Thankyou
    STERN Law STERN Law
    The best service ever very please and happy
    Facebook
    STERN Law STERN Law
    My wife found Stern Law on Google. We hired Stern Law to keep our family together. Christina went to...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Great staff and I’m happy and will send anyone at this law firm for any issues. They also take great...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Google
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Google
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Stern Law has been my partner and gave me a place to make my dreams come true. From the moment I ste...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Professional team, reasonably priced.
    STERN Law STERN Law
    The are really fast at getting your case started. My documents were about to expair in less then a m...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Simply put, they are awesome. They check in with you after the initial consultation and make sure yo...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    One of the best law firm one can have on their side , excellent service, extremely helpful and skill...
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Google
    STERN Law STERN Law
    I have nothing but positive things to say. My Immigration case was very complicated. My only advise ...
    Google
    STERN Law STERN Law
    Call Now